Finance & Trading
The Problem
Your backtest incorporates data the model could not have seen at decision time. The 20-day moving average that includes future prices is indistinguishable from one that does not, because the model processes all context tokens simultaneously. Temporal leakage is invisible until production losses surface it.
How Ejentum Solves It
One API call forces your model to verify temporal direction before accepting any causal claim from market data. Lookahead bias becomes structurally impossible.
The Failures
- 01
The Pattern
Correlated features accepted as causal signals in factor models, contaminating risk attribution
Why It Happens
Statistical co-occurrence in training data is indistinguishable from causation without an explicit causal graph. The model has no mechanism to test whether a relationship is directional or coincidental.
The Resolution
CA-007Bayesian UpdaterEnforces explicit prior-to-posterior updates on every evidence review. The model cannot anchor on initial estimates or treat statistical association as causal proof.
Supported byCA-015 Data Skeptic - 02
The Pattern
Backtests silently incorporate future data via temporal leakage in the reasoning chain
Why It Happens
The model processes all context tokens simultaneously. It has no internal clock separating "data available at decision time" from "data available after." Temporal ordering must be enforced externally.
The Resolution
TE-003Causality EnforcerBlocks any causal claim where the effect precedes the cause in the timeline. No indicator can be treated as leading if it follows the event it supposedly predicts.
Supported byTE-001 Temporal Auditor - 03
The Pattern
Risk factor correlations estimated during calm markets applied unchanged during crises, when correlations converge toward 1.0 and diversification collapses
Why It Happens
Correlation matrices are estimated from historical windows that overrepresent normal conditions. The model treats the estimated matrix as stable, but correlation is non-stationary: under stress, asset classes that appeared independent become tightly coupled.
The Resolution
SI-004Monte Carlo Resilience TesterStress-tests portfolio correlation assumptions under crisis scenarios, exposing the gap between calm-market diversification estimates and stressed-market co-movement.
Supported bySI-027 Regime Shift Discriminator
The Evidence
BBH/CausalBench/MuSR, 70 tasks
Financial evaluations have strict temporal boundaries with single correct answers. A single scaffold that enforces chronological isolation outperforms four competing perspectives that debate direction.
Baseline estimated project duration with optimistic linear assumptions. Haki enforced dependency chain analysis and identified the critical path constraint that doubled the realistic timeline. Correctness flipped from 1/3 to 3/3.
Scaffold value compounds with task length. Measured on ARC-AGI-3: scaffold half-life of 24 steps, reasoning quality improving (+0.014 slope) instead of degrading (-0.005 baseline).
Behavioral Signals
EjBench, 180 tasks, blind protocol
Self-Monitoring
+92%
0.94/3.0 → 1.81/3.0
Epistemic Honesty
+26%
1.54/3.0 → 1.94/3.0
Verification
+44%
1.50/3.0 → 2.16/3.0
Audit Trail
+5%
2.64/3.0 → 2.76/3.0
Start with one temporal isolation task. See the reasoning change in your first API call.