Ejentum · Reasoning Harness for Agentic AI

Your agent thinks it's reasoning well.
It lost the thread five steps ago

One API call. Your agent stops drifting, fabricating, and capitulating.

A reasoning harness that shapes how the model reasons and what failure modes to block. Matched to each task at runtime.

Connect any MCP client →api.ejentum.com/mcp

Ship agents that stay reliable at their 100th step.

Static cognition doesn't survive production.

Static reasoning baked at build time can't handle what agents encounter at runtime. Here's what breaks.

One-Size Reasoning

Your agent applies the same reasoning to a 3-step task and a 30-step chain. It cannot shift gears. The cognitive strategy is frozen at deploy time.

Error Multiplication

Three-agent chain at 90% step accuracy: 73% end-to-end success. Five agents: 59%. Reasoning errors don't add. They compound, each hop inheriting and amplifying what broke upstream.

Silent Failures

Reasoning failures don't throw exceptions. By the time wrong output surfaces, the agent has already made three more decisions on top of the bad one. There's no stack trace for cognition.

Attention Dilution

Models lose mid-prompt content. The guardrail you need is the one the model stopped reading by token 2,000. Your 5,000-token system prompt competes with itself.

False Hypothesis Lock-in

The agent commits to its first interpretation and never self-corrects. On ARC-AGI-3, this is the #1 failure mode of every frontier model. The hypothesis feels right, so the agent stops questioning it.

Shallow Stopping

The agent reaches the first plausible answer and presents it as final. No verification, no alternatives considered, no uncertainty flagged. In our benchmarks, baseline agents self-monitored on less than 25% of tasks.

Cross-Domain Blindness

Your agent reasons well about causality but misses the temporal dependency. Or nails the spatial layout but ignores the simulation consequences. Real tasks span multiple dimensions. Single-lens reasoning misses the intersection.

These are architecture problems, not prompt problems. The fix is inference-time reasoning correction: a different cognitive ability retrieved for every task, selected at runtime.

Imagine your agent's query
to Ejentum.

Agent

Your Agent

POST api.ejentum.com/harness/
Authorization: Bearer YOUR_KEY
{
  "query": "We changed the checkout flow and conversion rose. Did the change cause it?",
  "mode": "reasoning"
}
API Reference
Ejentum

Ejentum

[PROCEDURE]
Step 1: Identify the intervention being attributed.
Step 2: Simulate the counterfactual world where
        ONLY that element is absent.
Step 3: Compute factual - counterfactual outcomes.

[NEGATIVE GATE]
Treating temporal coincidence as causation
without ruling out confounders.

Amplify: counterfactual_construction
Suppress: post_hoc_attribution
Output

LLM Output

The change coincided with +18% conversion. But seasonality, concurrent marketing, A/B leakage, and traffic mix must be quantified before attribution. The residual lift after that audit is the actual answer.

More examples

Condensed for display. Full live responses on the Quickstart page.

No-code

n8n or Make.com? One HTTP Request node. Paste the endpoint.

n8n guide

Heym

Multi-agent canvas. Wire as a tool, or connect the agent's MCP to api.ejentum.com/mcp.

Heym guide

Agentic IDEs

Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, Codex. One skill file. Auto-absorbed.

Skill file

Agents with Ejentum vs Agents without.

Same frontier model. Same tasks. Once without Ejentum, once with. Five benchmarks, four harnesses, one change.

Code
85.7%100%
LCB-hard pass rate
28 AtCoder tasks · Opus 4.6
Code
70
SciCode bugs
10 scientific tasks · blind eval
Reasoning
12x
reasoning depth
ARC-AGI-3 trace analysis · 50 steps
Anti-Deception
5.8%
sycophancy rate
40 Reddit scenarios · ELEPHANT
Memory
3x
perceptual detection
memory bench · blind eval

The model already had all of this. Coding passes jumped to 100% when the spirals stopped. Scientific bugs fell to zero when the shortcuts got blocked. Reasoning depth multiplied twelvefold when the drift got caught. Sycophancy dropped to 5.8% when the flattery reflex got suppressed. Perception tripled when observation got enforced.

The harness doesn't add capability. It removes the failure that was consuming it.

base modelsame model with Ejentum

Drop in anywhere

LangChain
LangGraphLangGraph
CrewAICrewAI
n8n
HeymHeym
LlamaIndexLlamaIndex
FlowiseFlowise
LangflowLangflow
MastraMastra
Make.com
Zapier
BotpressBotpress
VoiceflowVoiceflow
AgentOpsAgentOps
SmolagentsSmolagents
AntigravityAntigravity
CodexCodex
Claude CodeClaude Code
OpenAI
Anthropic
Google
Meta
Mistral
GroqGroq
CohereCohere
Hugging Face
Amazon Bedrock
Microsoft Azure
xAIxAI
Replicate
DeepSeekDeepSeek
Inception LabsInception Labs
Fireworks AIFireworks AI
Nous ResearchNous Research
Perplexity

Developer-first. No contracts.

One month free. 1,000 dynamic calls. No card.

Super

dynamic + adaptive · all harnesses

€25/month

Tailored reasoning. The harness rewrites the cognitive operation to fit your specific task. Safety checks stay locked.

Get Started →
  • 5,000 dynamic calls/month
  • 1,500 adaptive calls/month
  • 4 harnesses · 679 cognitive abilities
  • Safety locks always active (failure guard, suppression, checkpoint)
  • Hosted MCP at api.ejentum.com/mcp

Go

dynamic + adaptive · all harnesses

€5/month

Dynamic reasoning across all four harnesses. Adaptive included.

  • 1,000 dynamic calls/month
  • 250 adaptive calls/month
  • 4 harnesses · 679 cognitive abilities
  • Same API surface as Super
Get Started →

Free trial

one month · no card

€0/30 days

See what the harness does to your agent before deciding.

  • 1,000 dynamic calls
  • Dynamic modes only (no adaptive)
  • All four harnesses unlocked
  • No payment method required
Start Free →

Start free. Step up to Go for ongoing use. Super when your agent needs adaptive reasoning at production volume.

Ejentum doesn't help every agent. If you're running a single-step classifier, a simple RAG lookup, or any task where the model already converges in one hop, you're paying for cognitive overhead you don't need. Ejentum earns its cost on multi-step chains where errors compound: planning agents, research agents, code agents that touch more than a handful of files. If that's not you, don't buy this yet.

Frank Brsrk

Founder

The thread holds.
Every step.

One month free. 1,000 dynamic calls. No card.