SISimulationID: SI-049

Goal Stack Integrity Auditor

Ki · Reasoning

The Problem

The marketing campaign's social media engagement goal has drifted into a means-ends inversion, prioritizing likes over sales.

The Operation

This cognitive operation forces the model to state top-level goal as single sentence. List all subgoals; trace each back to top-level goal by explaining how it advances the main objective. If any subgoal cannot be traced back, flag as potential goal drift. For flagged subgoals, classify as means-ends inversion, subgoal hijacking, or mission creep. Check whether current action directly serves a connected subgoal or has drifted. Let subgoal operate without explicit link primary goal is rejected.

The Structure

Under the hood, the reasoning follows a chain of custody audit that traces the provenance of every claim. The loop runs until all inputs are processed or no new progress emerges.

If a subgoal has displaced the original objective without the priority inversion being flagged, goal stack integrity auditing has failed.

Haki · Reasoning-Multi

Cross-Domain Suppression

In Haki mode, the API retrieves the primary ability first, then fans out to three synergy roles that compound its reasoning.

PrimarySI-049Goal Stack Integrity Auditor

When retrieved in Haki mode, the primary ability is augmented with failure guards extracted from 3 abilities in different cognitive domains. Each guard blocks a specific reasoning failure the primary alone wouldn't catch. A self-check forces verification before output. The result is cross-domain coverage that no single ability can reach alone.