LCB-05: Defect
The Task
Scroll to read full problem statement
The Code
Claude Opus 4.6 with max-effort extended thinking. Exact outputs. Side by side.
Baseline
PASS1131ch / 515simport sys
def main():
inp = sys.stdin.buffer.read().split()
ptr = 0
H = int(inp[ptr]); ptr += 1
W = int(inp[ptr]); ptr += 1
N = int(inp[ptr]); ptr += 1
S = W + 2
hole = bytearray(S * (H + 2))
row_has_hole = bytearray(H + 2)
for _ in range(N):
a = int(inp[ptr]); ptr += 1
b = int(inp[ptr]); ptr += 1
hole[a * S + b] = 1
row_has_hole[a] = 1
nxt = [0] * S
ans = 0
for i in range(H, 0, -1):
cur = [0] * S
if row_has_hole[i]:
off = i * S
for j in range(W, 0, -1):
if not hole[off + j]:
a = cur[j + 1]
b = nxt[j]
c = nxt[j + 1]
if b < a: a = b
if c < a: a = c
cur[j] = a + 1
else:
for j in range(W, 0, -1):
a = cur[j + 1]
b = nxt[j]
c = nxt[j + 1]
if b < a: a = b
if c < a: a = c
cur[j] = a + 1
ans += sum(cur)
nxt = cur
print(ans)
main()Scroll to read full code
Augmented
PASS906ch / 157simport sys
def main():
data = sys.stdin.buffer.read().split()
idx = 0
H = int(data[idx]); idx += 1
W = int(data[idx]); idx += 1
N = int(data[idx]); idx += 1
holed = bytearray(H * W)
for _ in range(N):
a = int(data[idx]) - 1; idx += 1
b = int(data[idx]) - 1; idx += 1
holed[a * W + b] = 1
prev = [0] * (W + 1)
curr = [0] * (W + 1)
ans = 0
for i in range(H - 1, -1, -1):
base = i * W
for j in range(W - 1, -1, -1):
if holed[base + j]:
curr[j] = 0
else:
v = prev[j]
c = curr[j + 1]
p = prev[j + 1]
if c < v:
v = c
if p < v:
v = p
v += 1
curr[j] = v
ans += v
prev, curr = curr, prev
print(ans)
main()Scroll to read full code
Blind Evaluation
Independent evaluator. Randomized A/B labels. No knowledge of which solution used the injection.
Augmented 42, Baseline 38
| Dimension | Baseline | Augmented |
|---|---|---|
| Correctness | 10 | 10 |
| Efficiency | 8 | 7 |
| Code Structure | 6 | 8 |
| Readability | 5 | 8 |
| Robustness | 9 | 9 |
Blind Analysis
Both solutions implement the classic "maximal square" DP to count all holeless squares. The recurrence is: dp[i][j] = min(dp[neighbor1], dp[neighbor2], dp[diagonal]) + 1 when the cell has no hole, else 0. The total answer is the sum of all DP values, since a cell with value k contributes exactly k holeless squares (sizes 1 through k) anchored at that corner. Both are algorithmically correct with no edge-case bugs.
Blind Observation
The baseline reveals a performance-oriented mindset: flat memory layout, branch-based loop specialization, awareness that most rows are hole-free when N is small. These are the instincts of someone who has been burned by Python TLE verdicts and knows where CPython's interpreter overhead lives. The augmented solution reveals a clarity-oriented mindset: do the standard thing, do it cleanly, trust that the algorithm's O(HW) complexity is sufficient.
Source: LiveCodeBench Hard benchmark. Full code outputs: baseline · augmented · runner script & methodology