ARC-LS20-TRACE

Baseline (130 tokens)

Starting the game, trying action 1 to see what happens at level 0.

Ejentum Logic API (4,461 tokens)

Starting state analysis: Robot (#) is at approximately (16, 32) in a '+' corridor region. End goal appears to be the '!' area at rows 61-62 (bottom area). Intermediate states: robot needs to traverse '+' corridors downward through the maze structure. Path feasibility: the '+' region extends downward from current position through rows 33-49, with connections to the lower open area. No immediate '*' walls blocking downward movement. Action 2 likely corresponds to moving down/south toward the goal '!' symbols.

Baseline (5,671 tokens)

I can see goal-like tiles: '!' at rows 61-62. Action 2 likely moves south/down toward the tiles at the bottom of the map. I'll try moving south to explore the lower portion of the dungeon.

Ejentum Logic API (21,904 tokens)

RA2R query: "How do I navigate from (16,32) through corridor obstacles when rows 50-52 appear to be solid walls?"

Applying PREDICTIVE_MAPPING scaffold. Negative gate: don't skip intermediate validation. Start state: Robot '#' at (x=20, y=32). End state: Goal '!' at (x=19-50, y=61-62). Intermediate path validation (moving south): - (20,33): Row 33 shows '+' at x=20 → feasible - (20,34) through (20,49): Corridor open at x=20 → feasible - (20,50): Row 50 = '****' → x=20 is '*' wall → BLOCKED Moving DOWN is the correct first step. No transition gap between (20,32) and (20,33).

Baseline (0 tokens)

API timeout. Zero tokens produced. No self-diagnosis.

Ejentum Logic API (10,076 tokens)

RA2R query: "Robot appears stuck at (16,32) after 5 turns trying actions 2,3,4. Need to determine if action 1 (up) opens a path toward goal."

Reasoning timed out, but the RA2R query reveals the agent diagnosed its own stuck state before the timeout occurred.

Baseline (4,257 tokens)

Player (#) is at col 16, row 32. The goal (!) is at rows 61-62, cols ~40-57. Need to navigate east and south. There's a wall at cols 25-29 for rows 30-39, but the wide corridor at rows 25-29 spans cols 10-53 allowing eastward travel. Moving east first.

Ejentum Logic API (11,519 tokens)

Negative gate acknowledged: not reasoning purely in natural language without symbolic analysis. S1: Define symbols. Robot R=(rx,ry). Let rx≈20, ry≈32. Goal G=(gx,gy) where gx∈[27,50], gy∈{61,62}. S2: Path decomposition. The '+' traversable region spans: y∈[25,49], x∈[14,53] (with '*' walls at x<14, x>53, and a vertical '*' barrier at x=29-33 for y∈[30,39]). S3: Invariant search. Direction delta Δ=(gx-rx, gy-ry) = (+7 to +30, +29). Net movement required: DOWN and RIGHT.

Baseline (8,720 tokens)

Player (#) is at col 16, row 32. Goal (!) is at rows 61-62, cols 34-52. Need to move south. The wide open + area extends from rows 25-49. The corridor at cols 15-19 allows southward movement.

Ejentum Logic API (25,768 tokens)

RA2R query: "Robot at (20-21, 32-33) needs to reach goal at (34-52, 61-62). How to navigate around wall block at x=29-33?"

Negative gate acknowledged: not jumping from start to end without validating intermediate states. S1: Robot at (x=20, y=32). Goal at (x=34-54, y=61-62). S2: Enumerate intermediate states: - (20,32) → move north to y=25-29 corridor - Wall at x=25-29, y=30-39 blocks direct eastward movement at y=32 - At y=25-29, floor open from x=14 to x=53 — this is the crossing corridor - After crossing east to x=34+, find path south to y=61 S3: Feasibility: Row 31 at x=20 is '+' floor tile — movement north feasible.