Geometric Boundary Enforcer
Ki · Reasoning
The Problem
The map shows the bridge is both open and closed, which is an impossible coexistence of states.
The Operation
Under this ability, the model must identify all claims asserted simultaneously and enumerate them as a conflict-candidate set. Compare each pair for mutual exclusion by checking logical or definitional incompatibility. If two incompatible claims coexist, flag the contradiction and demand resolution stating which yields. Reject downstream reasoning built on unresolved conflicts. Verify the surviving set is consistent by testing each remaining pair after removals. If it detects allow contradictory claims persist, it halts and corrects.
The Structure
Under the hood, the reasoning follows an accumulate-classify-decide pattern that gathers evidence, categorizes it, then concludes.
If two mutually exclusive states are asserted as simultaneously true, exclusion checking was not applied.
Haki · Reasoning-Multi
Cross-Domain Suppression
In Haki mode, the API retrieves the primary ability first, then fans out to three synergy roles that compound its reasoning.
When retrieved in Haki mode, the primary ability is augmented with failure guards extracted from 3 abilities in different cognitive domains. Each guard blocks a specific reasoning failure the primary alone wouldn't catch. A self-check forces verification before output. The result is cross-domain coverage that no single ability can reach alone.
Appears in Use Cases